Follow the Harvard Press on FacebookFollow us on Facebook!  and TwitterFollow us on Twitter!

Wednesday, May 23, 2012  ·  Contact Us Register  ·  Subscribe/Renew  ·  Login
 
Appointment spurs commission resignations

A simmering dispute between members of the Harvard Historical Commission and members of the Board of Selectmen came to a boil this week when the commission chair and a former chair resigned in protest over the Board of Selectmen's handling of commission appointments.

Roseanne Saalfield, current chair, and Jonathan Feist, an alternate member and former chair, submitted letters of resignation to Selectmen Chair Marie Sobalvarro Tuesday night following a contentious meeting in which a divided Board of Selectmen–with four of five members present—refused to reconsider a recent appointment to the Historical Commission or, in the view of two Selectmen, to admit that it had failed to follow its own policies.

Sobalvarro met with Saalfield Wednesday morning to urge her to withdraw her letter, but Saalfield and Feist told the Press later that afternoon that they would stick with their decision.

"I remain resigned until and unless someone talks me out of this plan of action, which I don't expect," Saalfield wrote the Press in an email. "It's a hard, hard choice for me as I care so much about the important work the [Historical Commission] is doing—or trying to do—and yet feel so strongly that the [Board of Selectmen] recruitment and appointment process, so called, is so flawed and damaging that I do not honestly feel I am being given all the tools I need to do my job correctly, in an atmosphere of trust and openness."

Selectman Ron Ricci, one of three who voted for the appointment, called the process "an embarrassment." The Board of Selectmen could head off future controversies, he said Tuesday night, by Sobalvarro "showing some leadership" in "getting the chair of the [Historical Commission] to follow the procedure and not try to exclude candidates who don't fit in their club."

The previous week, Ricci accused Saalfield, who was not present at the time, of playing games with the Board of Selectmen.

"I won't stand for it," he said.

The immediate cause of the resignations was the process that led to the appointment of Barbara Hadad last Thursday morning to an open seat on the Historical Commission before its members could complete their own interviews of two candidates for the position. The position was left vacant by Jared Wollaston when he resigned in September. Hadad was the only candidate present at the meeting last Thursday.

Sobalvarro had not intended the appointment to be on the agenda that day, she said. In response to a question by Selectman Tim Clark Tuesday, town executive assistant Julie Doucet said she had told Saalfield Selectmen did not plan to make the appointment Thursday morning.

Nevertheless, the Selectmen voted 3-2 to appoint Hadad, with Sobalvarro and Tim Clark opposing the motion. The two selectmen argued then that the board should wait to hear the Historical Commission's recommendation of before voting.

This week, during public comment at a Selectmen's meeting on Tuesday, Saalfield and Feist asked the board to reconsider the appointment. But a vote to reconsider requires a motion by at least one member of the majority who voted in favor. Neither Bill Johnson nor Ron Ricci responded to the request. Selectman Peter Warren wasn't at Tuesday's meeting.

Board of Selectmen policy calls for candidates who wish to serve on a town board to submit their written applications to Town Hall for review by Selectmen as well as members of the committee with the vacancy.

According to Board of Selectmen policy: "It is the responsibility of the office of the [Board of Selectmen] to notify the Applicant(s) and Chairmen of the prospective Board or Committee of the time and place of the interview/appointment. Except for reappointments, the candidate(s) and a representative(s) of the prospective Board or Committee shall be present as may be necessary to facilitate the appointment."

It's common for Selectmen as well as committee members to recruit new talent and to lobby for their candidates.

The Historical Commission has its own nominating committee, which, according to Feist in his letter of resignation, actively recruits candidates based on its assessment of the professional expertise the committee will need to handle upcoming projects. Many town committees have specialized needs and seek out professionals to help them do their work for the town. But the final decision belongs to the Board of Selectmen.

According to Saalfield's account, Hadad was not recruited by the Historical Commission but she did formally volunteer and apply for the position and was interviewed alone by Saalfield and then later by commission members on Nov. 8. According to Saalfield's account, the commission was unable to schedule an interview with a second candidate until December and had planned to bring both candidates to a future meeting of the Selectmen to be interviewed later that month.

In an email to the Press, Saalfield said she had personally discussed the opening with 17 potential candidates, but in the end only one completed the necessary paperwork and agreed to be interviewed for the position. She said she learned the board had appointed Hadad Thursday evening. It was the second time this year the board had acted without a recommendation from the commission, she said.

"A culture of animosity"

Sobalvarro told the Press Wednesday there are currently 10 vacancies on various town boards, and some have been open for months. Other committees have been allowed ample time to recruit and winnow a list of candidates, she said.

Sobalvarro said that when she made up the agenda for the Board of Selectmen's meeting last Thursday, she had planned to take up the appointment of Pam Frederick to the Council on Aging, which had the email endorsement of its co-chairs and had been pending for five weeks. But, she said, she failed to be explicit when she added the item to the agenda and instead titled the entry "Appointments." That left room for other appointments to be taken up. Sobalvarro said she was surprised to find Hadad present and the Historical Commission on the table.

Hadad told Selectmen during her interview that she was told to attend the meeting by someone whom she was not at liberty to identify. But she accused the Historical Commission and its chairman of bad faith. She said she felt the process had been rigged to exclude her from consideration. "If the process is so flawed," she asked Sobalvarro, "why would anyone want to put themselves through this?"

In his letter of resignation, Feist accused the Selectmen of "fostering a culture of animosity between town volunteers," and of "holding secret meetings and performing sneak attacks against those with whom you theoretically serve."

 

LETTERS OF RESIGNATION

Editor’s note: Historical Commission Chair Roseanne Saalfield and alternate member Jonathan Feist submitted letters of resignation to Selectmen Tuesday night. The complete text of their letters is below.


Please accept my resignation from the Harvard Historical Commission, effective immediately.

My decision to resign is a direct result of the Board’s refusal to accept the Commission’s recommendations regarding its appointments. I acknowledge, of course, the procedural role the Board of Selectmen play in making appointments to town boards and committees. It has also, however, always been my understanding that the Board permitted—in fact, encouraged—the chairpersons of all town committees composed of appointed officials to conduct a thorough, professional and careful recruiting process for all open positions. In lately contacting over fifteen Harvard residents for the current opening on the Historic Commission I have tried to do exactly that.

I fully believe that discouraging committee Chairs and members from being fully engaged in this recruiting process diminishes the effectiveness of the groups they serve. I submit that no one understands the requirements of the job and the committee’s short and long-term goals beter [sic] than the current members of that group and that the recruiting process itself increases the members’ effectiveness by encouraging open and frequent conversation about the group’s mission and their own role in supporting and refining it.

Respectfully,

Roseanne Saalfield
Woodchuck Hill Road

   


The manner in which the selectmen have been conducting Harvard’s business has been consistently at cross-purposes with those of us who are trying to perform high quality work and serve the town well. Specifically, I refer to your board’s:

  • Persistence in making appointments without open and proper vetting of candidates, or considering the opinions and preferred processes of the body to which they are appointed
  • Advocating for construction practices that are destructive to historic artifacts, resulting in their severe degradation (specifically, the Shaker Burial Ground)
  • Failing to consider expert opinions and carefully executed research
  • Fostering a culture of animosity between town volunteers, and undermining their legal and necessary functional authority
  • Holding secret meetings and performing sneak attacks against those with whom you theoretically serve

The effective way to manage town affairs would seem to be for the Selectmen to serve as generalists, while members of the Historical Commission, Planning Board, FinCom, Conservation Commission, Municipal Buildings Committee, and so on, to act as specialists. A governance model that builds on each other’s strengths would be to pull information from the specialists, weigh and collate them, and thus craft high quality opinions and strategies. Rather, you seem intent on enforcing your own ignorance upon the rest of us.

In so doing, you are squandering precious resources of time, expertise, and Harvard’s tradition of enthusiastic and good-faith volunteerism, as well as creating an unbearably toxic culture that discourages participation. Personally, I am no longer willing to waste my efforts, when you are working so doggedly to undermine them.
Therefore, after nine years of service, I hereby resign from the Historical Commission.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Feist
Shaker Road

 

Filed under: News
Comments
 
 
Post Comment
 

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

CAPTCHA image
Enter the code shown above:

 
CLICK AN AD!
Dinner at Deadline
Gingersnap Bakery
3Rivers Arts
Global Fitness
Merrill Excavating
Harvard Home & Yard Services
Mounsey Mulch
Marcus Lewis Day Camp
Harrod, Warren
Inspired Design
Copyright 2006–2012 by The Harvard Press LLC  ·  PO Box 284  ·  Harvard, Massachusetts 01451  ·  Phone 978.456.3700  ·  Fax 978.274.5605  ·  Terms Of Use  ·  Privacy Statement  ·  Site Credit